chr10-71741918-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):ā€‹c.4842G>Cā€‹(p.Leu1614=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000371 in 1,589,392 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L1614L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0022 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00018 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.656
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 10-71741918-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71741918-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 45956.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=4}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.656 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00219 (333/152344) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00767 (319/41590). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00698. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 172 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.4842G>C p.Leu1614= synonymous_variant 38/70 ENST00000224721.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.4842G>C p.Leu1614= synonymous_variant 38/705 NM_022124.6 P1Q9H251-1
CDH23ENST00000398792.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.1531G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 9/92

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00218
AC:
332
AN:
152228
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00767
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000478
AC:
99
AN:
207264
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000318
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
113158
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00755
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000179
AC:
257
AN:
1437048
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000147
AC XY:
105
AN XY:
712652
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00650
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000381
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.10e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000404
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00219
AC:
333
AN:
152344
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00231
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00767
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000158
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00241
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 30, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2022CDH23: BP4, BP7 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 15, 2012Leu1614Leu in Exon 38 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.6% (20/3554) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 01, 2017- -
Usher syndrome type 1D Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
CDH23-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 22, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
4.5
DANN
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368377560; hg19: chr10-73501675; API