chr10-71777900-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.5066T>C(p.Met1689Thr) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000255 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M1689V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH23 | ENST00000224721.12 | c.5066T>C | p.Met1689Thr | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 39 of 70 | 5 | NM_022124.6 | ENSP00000224721.9 | ||
| ENSG00000306531 | ENST00000819235.1 | n.158-835A>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | ||||||
| ENSG00000306531 | ENST00000819236.1 | n.157-732A>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | ||||||
| ENSG00000306531 | ENST00000819237.1 | n.146-830A>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000211 AC: 32AN: 151990Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000454 AC: 113AN: 248894 AF XY: 0.000622 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000259 AC: 378AN: 1461638Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000344 AC XY: 250AN XY: 727116 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152108Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000377 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74350 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
- -
- -
Identified in a patient who harbored a causative deletion in the NDP gene and classified as an incidental finding in published literature (Sudha et al., 2017); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28602015) -
Usher syndrome type 1D Uncertain:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Uncertain:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Met1689Thr in exon 39 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note, more than 20 different mammals have a threonine (Thr) at this position des pite high nearby amino acid conservation. In addition, computational analyses ( biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the Met1689Thr variant may not impact the protein. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12;C1832845:Usher syndrome type 1D Other:1
Variant interpretted as Uncertain significance and reported on 01/15/2018 by GTR ID Blueprint Genetics. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at