chr10-74095669-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_014000.3(VCL):​c.1557C>A​(p.Ile519=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000815 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0043 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

VCL
NM_014000.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
VCL (HGNC:12665): (vinculin) Vinculin is a cytoskeletal protein associated with cell-cell and cell-matrix junctions, where it is thought to function as one of several interacting proteins involved in anchoring F-actin to the membrane. Defects in VCL are the cause of cardiomyopathy dilated type 1W. Dilated cardiomyopathy is a disorder characterized by ventricular dilation and impaired systolic function, resulting in congestive heart failure and arrhythmia. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene, but the biological validity of some variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.28).
BP6
Variant 10-74095669-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-74095669-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45583.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-74095669-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.45 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00431 (656/152320) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0148 (616/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0139. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 321 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 656 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
VCLNM_014000.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1557C>A p.Ile519= synonymous_variant 12/22 ENST00000211998.10 NP_054706.1
VCLNM_003373.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1557C>A p.Ile519= synonymous_variant 12/21 NP_003364.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VCLENST00000211998.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1557C>A p.Ile519= synonymous_variant 12/221 NM_014000.3 ENSP00000211998 P18206-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00432
AC:
657
AN:
152202
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0149
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00123
AC:
309
AN:
251456
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.000861
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000809
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000452
AC:
660
AN:
1461696
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000384
AC XY:
279
AN XY:
727144
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000738
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000719
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000944
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00431
AC:
656
AN:
152320
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00431
AC XY:
321
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00221
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00459
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 06, 2018Variant summary: VCL c.1557C>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0022 in 277816 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database and literature, including 4 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 87.11 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in VCL causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1557C>A has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with palpitations (Campuzano_2012). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 17, 2012Ile519Ile in Exon 12 of VCL: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within t he splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 1.3% (49/3738) of Africa n American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Pro ject (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs150120464). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 11, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 11, 2016- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1W Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1W;C2750459:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 15 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 20, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 25, 2019- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 23, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Benign
8.7
DANN
Benign
0.82
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150120464; hg19: chr10-75855427; API