Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001161352.2(KCNMA1):c.3195C>T(p.Thr1065Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00787 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 72 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
KCNMA1 (HGNC:6284): (potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M alpha 1) This gene encodes the alpha subunit of calcium-activated BK channel. The encoded protein is involved in several physiological processes including smooth muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release and neuronal excitability. Mutations in this gene are associated with a spectrum of neurological disorders including Paroxysmal Nonkinesigenic Dyskinesia 3, Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy 16 and Liang-Wang syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2022]
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.095).
BP6
Variant 10-76891672-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-76891672-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129326.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-76891672-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-76891672-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.12 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00573 (872/152270) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00948 (645/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00888. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 398 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Apr 19, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
not specifiedBenign:3
Nov 24, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Jan 27, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Jun 01, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago