chr10-78033894-T-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_033022.4(RPS24):c.-8T>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00077 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00071 ( 16 hom. )
Consequence
RPS24
NM_033022.4 5_prime_UTR
NM_033022.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.13
Genes affected
RPS24 (HGNC:10411): (ribosomal protein S24) Ribosomes, the organelles that catalyze protein synthesis, consist of a small 40S subunit and a large 60S subunit. Together these subunits are composed of 4 RNA species and approximately 80 structurally distinct proteins. This gene encodes a ribosomal protein that is a component of the 40S subunit. The protein belongs to the S24E family of ribosomal proteins. It is located in the cytoplasm. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. As is typical for genes encoding ribosomal proteins, there are multiple processed pseudogenes of this gene dispersed through the genome. Mutations in this gene result in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 10-78033894-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-78033894-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 301091.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00139 (212/152322) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0329 (170/5174). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0288. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 111 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 212 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPS24 | NM_033022.4 | c.-8T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/6 | ENST00000372360.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPS24 | ENST00000372360.9 | c.-8T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/6 | 1 | NM_033022.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00140 AC: 213AN: 152204Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
213
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00269 AC: 677AN: 251422Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00237 AC XY: 322AN XY: 135882
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
677
AN:
251422
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
322
AN XY:
135882
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000705 AC: 1031AN: 1461784Hom.: 16 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000659 AC XY: 479AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1031
AN:
1461784
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
479
AN XY:
727204
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00139 AC: 212AN: 152322Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 111AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
212
AN:
152322
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
64
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Diamond-Blackfan anemia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 29, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 07, 2017 | - - |
POLR3-related leukodystrophy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 29, 2022 | - - |
Diamond-Blackfan anemia 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at