chr10-87061021-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Moderate
The NM_005271.5(GLUD1):c.953G>A(p.Arg318Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R318T) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005271.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 318 of the GLUD1 protein (p.Arg318Lys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individuals with hyperinsulinemia-hyperammonemia syndrome (PMID: 10636977, 35951311). This variant is also known as p.Arg265Lys. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 16127). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt GLUD1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at