chr10-88764786-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_001102469.2(LIPN):c.425+178G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.238 in 151,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,434 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001102469.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 8Inheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- lamellar ichthyosisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001102469.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIPN | NM_001102469.2 | MANE Select | c.425+178G>A | intron | N/A | NP_001095939.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIPN | ENST00000404459.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.425+178G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000383923.1 | |||
| LIPN | ENST00000674982.1 | n.736G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.237 AC: 35992AN: 151650Hom.: 4417 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.238 AC: 36051AN: 151768Hom.: 4434 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.236 AC XY: 17536AN XY: 74164 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at