chr10-95664099-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_015631.6(TCTN3):c.1792C>T(p.Leu598=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,613,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TCTN3
NM_015631.6 synonymous
NM_015631.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.128
Genes affected
TCTN3 (HGNC:24519): (tectonic family member 3) This gene encodes a member of the tectonic gene family which functions in Hedgehog signal transduction and development of the neural tube. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Orofaciodigital Syndrome IV and Joubert Syndrom 18. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 10-95664099-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-95664099-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 1963980.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.128 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN3 | NM_015631.6 | c.1792C>T | p.Leu598= | synonymous_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000371217.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN3 | ENST00000371217.10 | c.1792C>T | p.Leu598= | synonymous_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_015631.6 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152100
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251450Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135898
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
251450
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135898
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000116 AC: 17AN: 1461862Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727238
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74306
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152100
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74306
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Orofacial-digital syndrome IV;C3553758:Joubert syndrome 18 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 18, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at