chr10-97767849-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_003015.3(SFRP5):c.619C>T(p.Arg207Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000525 in 1,524,422 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R207H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003015.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003015.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFRP5 | NM_003015.3 | MANE Select | c.619C>T | p.Arg207Cys | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_003006.2 | Q5T4F7 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFRP5 | ENST00000266066.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.619C>T | p.Arg207Cys | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000266066.3 | Q5T4F7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 176160 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000437 AC: 6AN: 1372342Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000594 AC XY: 4AN XY: 673802 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74278 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at