chr10-98422429-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000195.5(HPS1):c.1683C>T(p.Cys561Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000589 in 1,614,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

HPS1
NM_000195.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.31

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

HPS1 (HGNC:5163): (HPS1 biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 3 subunit 1) This gene encodes a protein that may play a role in organelle biogenesis associated with melanosomes, platelet dense granules, and lysosomes. The encoded protein is a component of three different protein complexes termed biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex (BLOC)-3, BLOC4, and BLOC5. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 1. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A pseudogene related to this gene is located on chromosome 22. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2015]

HPS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome with pulmonary fibrosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

HPS1 links:

ENSG00000289758 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000289758 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).

BP6

Variant 10-98422429-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-98422429-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 167183.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.31 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0028 (426/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00974 (405/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00896. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 212 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HPS1	NM_000195.5 link	c.1683C>T	p.Cys561Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 20	ENST00000361490.9	NP_000186.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HPS1	ENST00000361490.9 link	c.1683C>T	p.Cys561Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 20	1	NM_000195.5	ENSP00000355310.4	Q92902-1
ENSG00000289758	ENST00000699159.1 link	n.*1042C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 16 of 24			ENSP00000514167.1	A0A8V8TP71
ENSG00000289758	ENST00000699159.1 link	n.*1042C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 24			ENSP00000514167.1	A0A8V8TP71

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00273

AC:

415

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00951

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000787

AC:

198

AN:

251478

AF XY:

0.000640

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00935

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000359

AC:

525

AN:

1461790

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000353

AC XY:

257

AN XY:

727186

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00998

AC:

334

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000648

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000185

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53402

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00347

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000549

AC:

AN:

1111938

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00108

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.473

Heterozygous variant carriers

130

162

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00280

AC:

426

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00285

AC XY:

212

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00974

AC:

405

AN:

41560

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000915

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00200

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00312

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 1

Benign:3

Sep 20, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 26, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 15, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

5.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.58

PhyloP100

1.3

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over