chr11-103245271-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.9960T>C​(p.Ala3320Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00466 in 1,544,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0048 ( 25 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.08

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 11-103245271-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103245271-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 302084.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.08 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00319 (485/152236) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00524 (356/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00479. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 207 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 25 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC2H1NM_001080463.2 linkc.9960T>C p.Ala3320Ala synonymous_variant Exon 66 of 90 ENST00000650373.2 NP_001073932.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1NM_001377.3 linkc.9939T>C p.Ala3313Ala synonymous_variant Exon 65 of 89 ENST00000375735.7 NP_001368.2 Q8NCM8-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC2H1ENST00000650373.2 linkc.9960T>C p.Ala3320Ala synonymous_variant Exon 66 of 90 NM_001080463.2 ENSP00000497174.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1ENST00000375735.7 linkc.9939T>C p.Ala3313Ala synonymous_variant Exon 65 of 89 1 NM_001377.3 ENSP00000364887.2 Q8NCM8-1
DYNC2H1ENST00000334267.11 linkc.2205+110852T>C intron_variant Intron 15 of 19 1 ENSP00000334021.7 Q8NCM8-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00318
AC:
484
AN:
152118
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000864
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00271
AC:
428
AN:
157898
AF XY:
0.00267
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000966
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000862
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000234
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00544
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00409
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00482
AC:
6707
AN:
1392668
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00479
AC XY:
3291
AN XY:
686982
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000700
AC:
22
AN:
31440
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00110
AC:
39
AN:
35448
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000598
AC:
15
AN:
25100
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35794
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
54
AN:
77868
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00170
AC:
84
AN:
49422
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000536
AC:
3
AN:
5600
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00583
AC:
6263
AN:
1074204
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00393
AC:
227
AN:
57792
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.446
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
280
560
841
1121
1401
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
246
492
738
984
1230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00319
AC:
485
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00278
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00128
AC:
53
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
31
AN:
15260
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000864
AC:
3
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
5
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00179
AC:
19
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00524
AC:
356
AN:
67996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000945
AC:
2
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
46
69
92
115
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00429
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00300
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000578
AC:
2
AN:
3474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jul 13, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 12, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DYNC2H1: BP4 -

Jan 10, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
8.8
DANN
Benign
0.79
PhyloP100
1.1
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs192003811; hg19: chr11-103116000; API