chr11-108248927-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP2_StrongBS1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The ATM c.1066-6T>G variant has a GnomAD (v2.1.1) filtering allele frequency of 0.2081% (NFE) which is above the ATM BS1 threshold of .05% (BS1). In silico predictors (SpliceAI Acceptor Loss 0.62; MaxEntScan -2.49) are indeterminate about whether this variant affects splicing. This variant has been observed in a homozygous and compound heterozygous state (presumed) in multiple individuals without Ataxia-Telangiectasia (BP2_Strong, GTR Lab IDs: 61756, 26957, 500031). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP Variant Curation Expert Panel LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA151456/MONDO:0016419/020

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.007766
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:7B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.14

Publications

31 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
ATM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • ataxia telangiectasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • gastric carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000051.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ATM
NM_000051.4
MANE Select
c.1066-6T>G
splice_region intron
N/ANP_000042.3
ATM
NM_001351834.2
c.1066-6T>G
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001338763.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ATM
ENST00000675843.1
MANE Select
c.1066-6T>G
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000501606.1
ATM
ENST00000452508.7
TSL:1
c.1066-6T>G
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000388058.2
ATM
ENST00000531525.3
TSL:1
c.1066-6T>G
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000434327.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00137
AC:
208
AN:
151992
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000411
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00134
AC:
320
AN:
239436
AF XY:
0.00132
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000551
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000852
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000346
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00217
AC:
3138
AN:
1447396
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00213
AC XY:
1536
AN XY:
720140
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000184
AC:
6
AN:
32548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000560
AC:
24
AN:
42852
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25820
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39592
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000801
AC:
67
AN:
83628
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000889
AC:
47
AN:
52858
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000371
AC:
2
AN:
5386
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00262
AC:
2896
AN:
1104922
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00161
AC:
96
AN:
59790
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
135
270
406
541
676
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
116
232
348
464
580
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00137
AC:
208
AN:
152108
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00112
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000410
AC:
17
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000654
AC:
10
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
8
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000189
AC:
2
AN:
10570
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00227
AC:
154
AN:
67960
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000946
AC:
2
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.509
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
29
43
58
72
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00222
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00156
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:24
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:9
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Sep 16, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 15, 2025
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1, BP2_mod

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 20, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 27, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 01, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 05, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26898890, 28779002, 28643015, 21933854, 10677309, 15101044, 11606401, 25040471, 27067391, 26250988, 18573109, 26662178, 27798748, 27296296, 19781682, 16958054, 27803004, 28627265, 28691344, 16914028, 28652578, 20544271, 30549301, 11830610, 32918381)

Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ATM: PP3, BS2

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Nov 01, 2006
OMIM
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 02, 2018
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Oct 30, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Feb 14, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 06, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Sep 27, 2021
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 09, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Dec 10, 2020
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:4
Feb 27, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 18, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 07, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ATM c.1066-6T>G alters a conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Although the variant was reported to be associated with a partial splicing defect (see e.g. Broeks_2000, Dork_2001, Fang_2010), several patient samples were also reported to have second-site mutations that could also affect splicing, therefor the splicing effect of the variant in isolation is currently unclear (Tavtigian_2009, Fievet_2019). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 270694 control chromosomes, predominantly within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0024 in the gnomAD database (including 2 homozygotes). The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. In addition, the variant was reported to be found in the FLOSSIES database in 33/7325 European American women, who were older than age 70 years and have never had cancer. The allele frequency in this cohort is also higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer (0.0023 vs. 0.001), further supporting a benign role for the variant. Though the variant has been reported in the literature in homozygous individuals affected with Ataxia Telangiectasia (A-T), these patients carried second-site mutations that were sufficient to explain the A-T phenotype (Tavtigian_2009, Fievet_2019). The variant was also reported in compound heterozygosity, with (potential) pathogenic ATM variants in trans, in an individual affected with breast cancer (Fang_2010) and also in a patient with multiple myeloma and (per authors) an atypical, milder A-T phenotype (Austen_2008). Therefore these reports do not support the association of the variant with A-T. The variant, c.1066-6T>G, also has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer, however in most of the cases co-occurrence and/or co-segregation data was not provided, therefore these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. Moreover, in case-control studies the variant did not have significantly increased risk association with breast cancer (Dork_2001, Bernstein_2006, Ding_2011). One recent case-control study reported the variant with an increased risk for CLL (OR: 3.29), however this analysis had a relatively small sample size and most patients were sporadic cases, thus this risk association might not be reliable (Tiao 2017). Twelve other submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014 (without evidence for independent evaluation), and classified the variant as VUS (4x), likely benign (3x) / benign (5x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jun 13, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 16, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Intellectual disability Uncertain:1
Dec 30, 2019
Cambridge Genomics Laboratory, East Genomic Laboratory Hub, NHS Genomic Medicine Service
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jun 23, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ATM-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Mar 09, 2022
ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The ATM c.1066-6T>G variant has a GnomAD (v2.1.1) filtering allele frequency of 0.2081% (NFE) which is above the ATM BS1 threshold of .05% (BS1). In silico predictors (SpliceAI Acceptor Loss 0.62; MaxEntScan -2.49) are indeterminate about whether this variant affects splicing. This variant has been observed in a homozygous and compound heterozygous state (presumed) in multiple individuals without Ataxia-Telangiectasia (BP2_Strong, GTR Lab IDs: 61756, 26957, 500031). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP Variant Curation Expert Panel

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Nov 05, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ATM c.1066-6T>G variant was identified in 51 of 18,694 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from individuals or families with chronic lymphocatic leukemia, breast or ovarian cancer and was present in 70 of 27,754 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from healthy individuals (Ding 2010, Tiao 2017). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs201686625) as “with other allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Integrated Genetics and 5 other submitters; as benign by Invitae, Color, Athena Diagnostics and 2 other submitters; and as likely benign by GeneDx and 2 other submitters) and LOVD 3.0 (observed 8x). The variant was identified in control databases in 357 of 266,346 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 7 of 23,658 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Other in 2 of 6198 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 19 of 32,652 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), European in 286 of 123,010 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Finnish in 18 of 25,254 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), and South Asian in 25 of 27,738 chromosomes (freq: 0.0009); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The variant was identified by our laboratory in multiple patients with pathogenic variants in BRCA2 (including c.1929del, p.Arg645Glufs*15 and c.755_758del, p.Asp252Valfs*24). The variant was also identified in the homozygous state in a patient with ataxia telangiectasia (Dork 2001), for whom alternate pathogenic variants were subsequently identified (Tavtigian 2009). A patient with mild ataxia telangiectasia was found to carry this variant in the compound heterozygous state and had reduced ATM protein expression and kinase activity, indicating this variant does not fully abolish protein expression and function (Austen 2016). Additionally, this variant leads to an increase in exon 11 skipping, although some exon 11 skipping is found in controls who do not carry this variant (Soukupova 2007). The c.1066-6T>G variant is located in the 3' splice region and does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence; variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing and 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
2.1
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0078
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.18
Splicevardb
3.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.62
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AL_spliceai
0.62
Position offset: 6

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201686625; hg19: chr11-108119654; COSMIC: COSV53728438; API