chr11-108257592-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.2362A>C​(p.Ser788Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000481 in 1,613,806 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S788G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.73
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0061477125).
BP6
Variant 11-108257592-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108257592-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 127349.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00242 (368/152330) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00844 (351/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00771. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 164 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2362A>C p.Ser788Arg missense_variant 15/63 ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2362A>C p.Ser788Arg missense_variant 15/63 NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00242
AC:
368
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00847
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000705
AC:
177
AN:
251232
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000567
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
135808
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000280
AC:
409
AN:
1461476
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000220
AC XY:
160
AN XY:
727050
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000335
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000381
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00242
AC:
368
AN:
152330
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00220
AC XY:
164
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00844
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.000535
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00306
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00750
AC:
33
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000865
AC:
105
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSpanish ATM Cancer Susceptibility Variant Interpretation Working GroupJun 17, 2020The c.2362A>C p.(Ser788Arg) missense variant has an allele frequency of 0.00944 (0.94%, 223/23,614 alleles) in the African population of the gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer dataset. Therefore, this variant meets a stand-alone criterion to be classified as benign (BA1; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Adapted ACMG/AMP rules applied as defined by the Spanish ATM working group: BA1 (PMID: 33280026). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 30, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 26, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 09, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 23, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Jul 12, 2017- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 16, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
not specified Benign:4Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 26, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 23, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 07, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 06, 2023- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 25, 2023- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Ser788Arg variant was identified in 3 of 3974 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00075) from individuals or families with Lynch Syndrome, breast cancer and a general healthy ancestrally diverse cohort in a study of germline variation in cancer-susceptibility genes (Bodian 2014, Yurgelun 2015, Ianuzzi 2002). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs641252) as “With other allele” and ClinVar (4x as benign by Invitae, EGL Genetics, Color, GeneDx and 6x as likely benign by University of Chicago Genetic services, Institute for Biomarker, Counsyl, True Health Diagnostics) databases. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, MutDB or LOVD 3.0, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 242 of 276996 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.00087 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 230 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.0095), Other in 2 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 8 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European Non-Finnish in 2 of 126668 chromosomes (freq: 0.000016), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Ser788Arg residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 08, 2024This variant is considered benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.84
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.076
.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.70
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.72
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0061
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
.;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.89
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.33
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.29
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.068
.;B;B
Vest4
0.52, 0.75
MutPred
0.45
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0134);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0134);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0134);
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
3.8
Varity_R
0.062
gMVP
0.17

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs641252; hg19: chr11-108128319; API