chr11-108331862-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.7630-17T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000453 in 1,611,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.253

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 11-108331862-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108331862-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136431.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00254 (387/152332) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00868 (361/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00794. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 179 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkc.7630-17T>C intron_variant Intron 51 of 62 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3 Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkc.7630-17T>C intron_variant Intron 51 of 62 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606.1 Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
383
AN:
152214
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00859
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000765
AC:
192
AN:
250882
AF XY:
0.000626
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00873
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000235
AC:
343
AN:
1459666
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000200
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
726256
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00688
AC:
230
AN:
33408
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
53
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26104
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39618
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86188
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53356
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000811
AC:
9
AN:
1110210
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000779
AC:
47
AN:
60314
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
30
46
61
76
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00254
AC:
387
AN:
152332
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00240
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00868
AC:
361
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
17
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19
38
56
75
94
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00166
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00241
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Feb 10, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 26, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2015
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jan 08, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 05, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jun 29, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Oct 10, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
0.25
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116047570; hg19: chr11-108202589; API