chr11-112094810-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_ModeratePP5_Moderate
The NM_003002.4(SDHD):c.320T>C(p.Leu107Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003002.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHD | NM_003002.4 | c.320T>C | p.Leu107Pro | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | ENST00000375549.8 | NP_002993.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The p.L107P variant (also known as c.320T>C), located in coding exon 4 of the SDHD gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 320. The leucine at codon 107 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant has been observed in multiple individuals with a personal and/or family history that is consistent with SDHD-associated disease (Ambry internal data). This variant was identified in a family with multiple cases of carotid body tumors (PGLs) and was shown to segregate with disease in the affected family members through the paternal line (Otani N et al. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 2017 Dec;47:1193-1197). This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.