chr11-119298466-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_005188.4(CBL):c.2360G>A(p.Arg787His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000427 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000036 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CBL
NM_005188.4 missense
NM_005188.4 missense
Scores
2
12
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 8.62
Genes affected
CBL (HGNC:1541): (Cbl proto-oncogene) This gene is a proto-oncogene that encodes a RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase. The encoded protein is one of the enzymes required for targeting substrates for degradation by the proteasome. This protein mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2) to specific substrates. This protein also contains an N-terminal phosphotyrosine binding domain that allows it to interact with numerous tyrosine-phosphorylated substrates and target them for proteasome degradation. As such it functions as a negative regulator of many signal transduction pathways. This gene has been found to be mutated or translocated in many cancers including acute myeloid leukaemia, and expansion of CGG repeats in the 5' UTR has been associated with Jacobsen syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also the cause of Noonan syndrome-like disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22900677).
BP6
Variant 11-119298466-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119298466-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 40423.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-119298466-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-119298466-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000363 (53/1461860) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000777 (26/33480). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000543. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 30 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL | NM_005188.4 | c.2360G>A | p.Arg787His | missense_variant | 15/16 | ENST00000264033.6 | NP_005179.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL | ENST00000264033.6 | c.2360G>A | p.Arg787His | missense_variant | 15/16 | 1 | NM_005188.4 | ENSP00000264033.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000597 AC: 15AN: 251462Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000662 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135906
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
251462
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
135906
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000363 AC: 53AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000413 AC XY: 30AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
727238
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
152302
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
6
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 28, 2022 | Variant summary: CBL c.2360G>A (p.Arg787His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6e-05 in 251462 control chromosomes (gnomAD). To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2360G>A in individuals affected with Noonan Syndrome-Like Disorder and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite this variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 30, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
RASopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 25, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;D
Polyphen
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at