chr11-121168765-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM1PP3PP5
The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.5839C>T(p.Arg1947Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000558 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005422.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74280 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 1947 of the TECTA protein (p.Arg1947Cys). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with nonsyndromic deafness (PMID: 21520338). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 449555). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed for this missense variant. However, the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on TECTA protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27368438, 21520338, 31554319, 9590290, 16718611) -
TECTA: PM2, PS4:Moderate -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Pathogenic. The p.Arg1947Cy s variant in TECTA has been reported in 2 individual with hearing loss and segre gated with hearing loss in at least 1 family member, with possible additional se gregations mentioned, but not specified, in one publication (Hildebrand 2011, LM M data). It has been identified in 1/15010 European chromosomes by the Genome A ggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 449555). Computational prediction t ools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Arg1947Cys variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine patho genicity. In summary, while there is some suspicion for a pathogenic role, the c linical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PS 4_Supporting, PP3, PM2. -
TECTA-related disorder Uncertain:1
The TECTA c.5839C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg1947Cys. This variant has previously been reported in an individual with autosomal dominant postlingual mid-frequency nonsyndromic hearing loss (Hildebrand et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21520338). This variant is reported in 0.0065% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at