chr11-128969305-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001378024.1(ARHGAP32):c.5908C>T(p.Pro1970Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001378024.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARHGAP32 | NM_001378024.1 | c.5908C>T | p.Pro1970Ser | missense_variant | 23/23 | ENST00000682385.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARHGAP32 | ENST00000682385.1 | c.5908C>T | p.Pro1970Ser | missense_variant | 23/23 | NM_001378024.1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251458Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 08, 2024 | The c.5866C>T (p.P1956S) alteration is located in exon 22 (coding exon 22) of the ARHGAP32 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 5866, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 1956 to be replaced by a serine (S). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at