chr11-1752809-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001909.5(CTSD):c.*694G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 155,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00062 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CTSD
NM_001909.5 3_prime_UTR
NM_001909.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -6.61
Genes affected
CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00114 (173/152374) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0032 (49/15312). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00249. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 80 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSD | NM_001909.5 | c.*694G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000236671.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSD | ENST00000236671.7 | c.*694G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_001909.5 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00114 AC: 173AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
173
AN:
152256
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000622 AC: 2AN: 3214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 1684
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3214
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
1684
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00114 AC: 173AN: 152374Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00107 AC XY: 80AN XY: 74512
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
173
AN:
152374
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74512
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at