chr11-1757436-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_001909.5(CTSD):c.592A>G(p.Ile198Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I198I) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000089 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CTSD
NM_001909.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.46

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CTSD Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 10
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P

CTSD links:

ENSG00000250644 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000250644 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20566139).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152314) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00111 (17/15310). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000707. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 9 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001909.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CTSD	NM_001909.5	MANE Select	c.592A>G	p.Ile198Val	missense	Exon 5 of 9	NP_001900.1	P07339

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
CTSD	ENST00000236671.7	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.592A>G	p.Ile198Val	missense	Exon 5 of 9	ENSP00000236671.2	P07339
ENSG00000250644	ENST00000636615.1	TSL:5	c.592A>G	p.Ile198Val	missense	Exon 5 of 10	ENSP00000490014.1	A0A1B0GU92
ENSG00000250644	ENST00000636397.1	TSL:5	c.592A>G	p.Ile198Val	missense	Exon 5 of 10	ENSP00000489910.1	A0A1B0GU03

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000160

AC:

AN:

250560

AF XY:

0.0000295

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000889

AC:

AN:

1461794

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000963

AC XY:

AN XY:

727200

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53346

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000828

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.448

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152314

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41580

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00111

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5148

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000136

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000280

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Uncertain significance

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (1)

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 10 (1)

not provided (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.52

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.23

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.31

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.30

Eigen

Benign

-0.12

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.049

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.86

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

M_CAP

Benign

0.047

MetaRNN

Benign

0.21

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.85

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.0

PhyloP100

5.5

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.61

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.66

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.049

Sift4G

Benign

0.16

Polyphen

0.15

Vest4

0.56

MutPred

0.73

Loss of methylation at K194 (P = 0.1091)

MVP

0.39

MPC

0.51

ClinPred

0.14

GERP RS

1.5

PromoterAI

0.041

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

Varity_R

0.24

gMVP

0.77

Mutation Taster

=53/47

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over