chr11-17591467-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.2885C>T(p.Ser962Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000174 in 1,550,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.01

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.14438221).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001292063.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	OTOG	NM_001292063.2	MANE Select	c.2885C>T	p.Ser962Leu	missense	Exon 25 of 56	NP_001278992.1
	OTOG	NM_001277269.2		c.2921C>T	p.Ser974Leu	missense	Exon 24 of 55	NP_001264198.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
OTOG	ENST00000399397.6	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.2885C>T	p.Ser962Leu	missense	Exon 25 of 56	ENSP00000382329.2
OTOG	ENST00000399391.7	TSL:5	c.2921C>T	p.Ser974Leu	missense	Exon 24 of 55	ENSP00000382323.2
OTOG	ENST00000342528.2	TSL:2	n.372-1726C>T		intron	N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000670

AC:

AN:

149312

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000182

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000179

AC:

AN:

1398364

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000159

AC XY:

AN XY:

689698

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

31598

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35704

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25182

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35738

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

79230

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

48200

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5698

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000213

AC:

AN:

1078988

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000345

AC:

AN:

58026

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.457

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74384

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41460

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5202

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4838

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68046

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2088

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.0385499), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.375

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Jul 07, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Ser974Leu variant in OTOG has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss and data from large population studies are insufficient to ass ess the frequency of this variant in the general population. Computational predi ction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or again st an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Ser9 74Leu variant is uncertain.

not provided

Uncertain:1

Apr 07, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.083

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.15

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.91

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.044

Eigen

Benign

0.010

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.067

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Benign

0.83

M_CAP

Benign

0.020

MetaRNN

Benign

0.14

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.85

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.58

PhyloP100

3.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.42

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.080

REVEL

Benign

0.043

Sift

Benign

0.68

Sift4G

Benign

0.066

Vest4

0.12

MutPred

0.58

Loss of catalytic residue at S974 (P = 0.0519)

MVP

0.60

ClinPred

0.20

GERP RS

2.9

Varity_R

0.078

gMVP

0.28

Mutation Taster

=83/17

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over