chr11-18744101-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The ENST00000358540.7(PTPN5):āc.196T>Cā(p.Ser66Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0121 in 1,611,294 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 167 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000358540.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPN5 | NM_006906.2 | c.196T>C | p.Ser66Pro | missense_variant | 4/15 | ENST00000358540.7 | NP_008837.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPN5 | ENST00000358540.7 | c.196T>C | p.Ser66Pro | missense_variant | 4/15 | 1 | NM_006906.2 | ENSP00000351342 | ||
PTPN5 | ENST00000396168.1 | c.124T>C | p.Ser42Pro | missense_variant | 3/14 | 1 | ENSP00000379471 | P1 | ||
PTPN5 | ENST00000396170.5 | c.196T>C | p.Ser66Pro | missense_variant | 4/15 | 2 | ENSP00000379473 | |||
PTPN5 | ENST00000496201.2 | n.243T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/5 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00882 AC: 1341AN: 152104Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00778 AC: 1920AN: 246726Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.00802 AC XY: 1073AN XY: 133712
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0124 AC: 18165AN: 1459072Hom.: 156 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0121 AC XY: 8798AN XY: 725928
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00879 AC: 1338AN: 152222Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00848 AC XY: 631AN XY: 74416
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at