chr11-26598397-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The ENST00000256737.8(ANO3):c.1480A>T(p.Arg494Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000128 in 1,564,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R494R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000256737.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANO3 | NM_031418.4 | c.1480A>T | p.Arg494Trp | missense_variant | 15/27 | ENST00000256737.8 | NP_113606.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANO3 | ENST00000256737.8 | c.1480A>T | p.Arg494Trp | missense_variant | 15/27 | 1 | NM_031418.4 | ENSP00000256737 | P3 | |
ANO3 | ENST00000672621.1 | c.1663A>T | p.Arg555Trp | missense_variant | 16/28 | ENSP00000500506 | ||||
ANO3 | ENST00000525139.5 | c.1432A>T | p.Arg478Trp | missense_variant | 15/27 | 5 | ENSP00000432576 | |||
ANO3 | ENST00000531568.1 | c.1042A>T | p.Arg348Trp | missense_variant | 12/24 | 2 | ENSP00000432394 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.08e-7 AC: 1AN: 1412356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000143 AC XY: 1AN XY: 701524
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dystonia 24 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Dec 07, 2012 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at