chr11-32388194-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.*864T>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00329 in 233,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
WT1
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.42
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 11-32388194-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32388194-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 304387.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00455 (692/152208) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0161 (667/41498). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0151. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 295 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 692 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | NM_024426.6 | c.*864T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000452863.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | ENST00000452863.10 | c.*864T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | 1 | NM_024426.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00455 AC: 692AN: 152090Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
692
AN:
152090
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000932 AC: 76AN: 81502Hom.: 2 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000719 AC XY: 27AN XY: 37528
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
76
AN:
81502
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
37528
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00455 AC: 692AN: 152208Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00396 AC XY: 295AN XY: 74416
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
692
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
295
AN XY:
74416
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at