chr11-32435047-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting

The NM_024426.6(WT1):​c.314C>G​(p.Ala105Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000369 in 1,464,284 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A105S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000033 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

2
1
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.39
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20041999).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkc.314C>G p.Ala105Gly missense_variant Exon 1 of 10 ENST00000452863.10 NP_077744.4 P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkc.314C>G p.Ala105Gly missense_variant Exon 1 of 10 1 NM_024426.6 ENSP00000415516.5 P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000724
AC:
11
AN:
151960
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000128
AC:
8
AN:
62338
AF XY:
0.0000840
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000256
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
43
AN:
1312324
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.0000310
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
645788
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000351
AC:
9
AN:
25636
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000435
AC:
10
AN:
22974
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000471
AC:
1
AN:
21226
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30844
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000144
AC:
1
AN:
69260
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32346
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000263
AC:
1
AN:
3808
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000152
AC:
16
AN:
1051760
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000918
AC:
5
AN:
54470
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.533
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000724
AC:
11
AN:
151960
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000539
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74230
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000483
AC:
2
AN:
41432
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000458
AC:
7
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5132
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
314
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
67952
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.543
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000473
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3468

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Jun 05, 2022
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:2
Jun 17, 2025
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The WT1 c.314C>G (p.Ala105Gly) missense change has an over all frequency of 0.058% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in two siblings with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome who were also homozygous for NPHS1 p.Arg586Gly. Notably, their phenotype was more severe than a third sibling who carried only the NPHS1 variant (PMID: 23349334). This variant has also been reported in individuals with breast cancer, primary ovarian insufficiency and disorder of gonadal development (PMID: 35264596, 36099812, 36110220). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Jul 02, 2018
Mendelics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Disorder of sexual differentiation Uncertain:1
Aug 15, 2021
Human Developmental Genetics, Institut Pasteur
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Paternal inheritance -

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Aug 29, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.A100G variant (also known as c.299C>G), located in coding exon 1 of the WT1 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 299. The alanine at codon 100 is replaced by glycine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant was identified in siblings with congenital nephrotic syndrome and both also had a co-occurring variant in NPHS1 (McCarthy HJ et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013 Apr;8:637-48). This variant was also reported in an Algerian patient with disorder of gonadal development (Zidoune H et al. Front Genet, 2022 Aug;13:900574). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0344542:Aniridia 1;C0345967:Mesothelioma, malignant;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;C1837026:Meacham syndrome;C3151568:Nephrotic syndrome, type 4;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Drash syndrome Uncertain:1
Sep 15, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

WT1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Sep 23, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The WT1 c.299C>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ala100Gly. This variant (also described as c.314C>G, p.Ala105Gly in NM_024426.6) has been reported in the homozygous state in a pair of siblings with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) who were also apparently homozygous for another missense variant (p.Arg586Gly) in the NPHS1 gene (McCarthy et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23349334). Of note, both of these individuals were reported to have a more severe phenotype than a third sibling who was also homozygous for the NPHS1 variant but negative for WT1 p.Ala100Gly. The p.Ala100Gly variant has also been observed in the heterozygous state in individuals with various WT1-associated phenotypes including breast cancer (Table S3, Guindalini et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35264596), primary ovarian insufficiency (Table S7, Heddar et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36099812), and disorders of sex development (DSD) (Zidoune et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36110220). This variant is reported in 0.058% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD; however, the quality of this data is questionable and should be treated with caution. This variant is interpreted as uncertain by multiple laboratories in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/476699/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Dec 23, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.27
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Benign
0.88
Eigen
Benign
-0.53
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.95
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.20
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.51
T
PhyloP100
3.4
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.95
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.16
N;N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.32
T;T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.42
T;T;T;.;.;.
Vest4
0.10
MVP
0.52
ClinPred
0.038
T
GERP RS
1.9
PromoterAI
-0.054
Neutral

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar for variant 11:32435047 G>C . It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs948061247; hg19: chr11-32456593; API