chr11-32435332-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The ENST00000452863.10(WT1):c.29C>A(p.Ala10Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000587 in 1,532,268 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 9/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A10I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000452863.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | NM_024426.6 | c.29C>A | p.Ala10Asp | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000452863.10 | NP_077744.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | ENST00000452863.10 | c.29C>A | p.Ala10Asp | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_024426.6 | ENSP00000415516 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000330 AC: 5AN: 151516Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000290 AC: 4AN: 1380752Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00000147 AC XY: 1AN XY: 681202
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000330 AC: 5AN: 151516Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000270 AC XY: 2AN XY: 73998
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 28, 2021 | - - |
Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at