chr11-44232450-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_207122.2(EXT2):c.1760C>T(p.Thr587Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000944 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T587T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_207122.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- exostoses, multiple, type 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P
- seizures-scoliosis-macrocephaly syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- hereditary multiple osteochondromasInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000612 AC: 93AN: 152058Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000673 AC: 169AN: 251230 AF XY: 0.000781 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000979 AC: 1431AN: 1461762Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 733AN XY: 727188 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000612 AC: 93AN: 152058Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000660 AC XY: 49AN XY: 74266 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Exostoses, multiple, type 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
The EXT2 c.1859C>T (p.Thr620Met) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.15% in gnomAD v2.1.1 including 1 homozygote (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a deleterious effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been identified in at least one individual with multiple exostoses (PMID: 19810120, 28567303). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
not provided Uncertain:3
- -
- -
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19810120, 24728327, 28567303, 34426522, 32191290, 32570879, 34070849, 30666157) -
EXT2-related disorder Uncertain:1
The EXT2 c.1760C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Thr587Met. This variant has been reported in a patient with some clinical features of multiple exostoses (Stavropoulos et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 28567303). However, this variant was also reported in a healthy cohort (Bodian et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24728327) and has been observed in a public database with allele frequency up to ~0.15% in South Asian populations including one homozygote, which is likely too common for a highly penetrant pathogenic variant. In ClinVar, this variant has conflicting interpretations of likely benign and uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/134204/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not specified Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at