chr11-5841212-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001005167.2(OR52E6):c.686T>G(p.Leu229Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000984 in 1,613,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L229V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001005167.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001005167.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR52E6 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.686T>G | p.Leu229Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000328878.5 | Q96RD3 | ||
| TRIM5 | TSL:1 | c.-62+96189T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000388031.1 | E7EQQ5 | |||
| OR52E6 | TSL:6 | c.698T>G | p.Leu233Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000369279.2 | J3KPH0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00538 AC: 819AN: 152194Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00129 AC: 323AN: 249562 AF XY: 0.000851 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000525 AC: 768AN: 1461658Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000406 AC XY: 295AN XY: 727100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00538 AC: 820AN: 152312Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00501 AC XY: 373AN XY: 74484 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at