Variant chr11-61392541-G-A details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The ENST00000398979.7(TMEM216):c.-288G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00122 in 1,313,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00070 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 37 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM216
ENST00000398979.7 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.232

Variant links:

Genes affected

TMEM216 (HGNC:25018): (transmembrane protein 216) This locus encodes a transmembrane domain-containing protein. Mutations at this locus have been associated with Meckel-Gruber Syndrome Type 2, and Joubert Syndrome 2, also known as Cerebello-oculorenal Syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

TMEM216 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BP6

Variant 11-61392541-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-61392541-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 305075.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000702 (107/152322) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0192 (93/4834). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 84 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	Effect	MANE	Protein
TMEM216	NM_001173990.3 linkuse as main transcript	upstream_gene_variant	ENST00000515837.7	NP_001167461.1
TMEM216	NM_001173991.3 linkuse as main transcript	upstream_gene_variant		NP_001167462.1
TMEM216	NM_001330285.2 linkuse as main transcript	upstream_gene_variant		NP_001317214.1
TMEM216	NM_016499.6 linkuse as main transcript	upstream_gene_variant		NP_057583.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TMEM216	ENST00000515837.7 linkuse as main transcript			upstream_gene_variant		2	NM_001173990.3	ENSP00000440638	P4	Q9P0N5-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000703

AC:

107

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0192

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00129

AC:

1501

AN:

1160780

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00196

AC XY:

1139

AN XY:

580894

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000379

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000923

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0191

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000938

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000702

AC:

107

AN:

152322

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00113

AC XY:

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0192

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000416

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000196

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00953

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meckel syndrome, type 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome 2

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

1.9

DANN

Benign

0.87

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over