chr11-61398297-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001173990.3(TMEM216):c.*21A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00753 in 1,610,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0077 ( 61 hom. )
Consequence
TMEM216
NM_001173990.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_001173990.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0550
Genes affected
TMEM216 (HGNC:25018): (transmembrane protein 216) This locus encodes a transmembrane domain-containing protein. Mutations at this locus have been associated with Meckel-Gruber Syndrome Type 2, and Joubert Syndrome 2, also known as Cerebello-oculorenal Syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 11-61398297-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-61398297-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 257594.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0059 (898/152316) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.01 (682/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0094. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 382 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 61 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM216 | NM_001173990.3 | c.*21A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000515837.7 | NP_001167461.1 | ||
TMEM216 | NM_001173991.3 | c.*21A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | NP_001167462.1 | |||
TMEM216 | NM_016499.6 | c.*21A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | NP_057583.2 | |||
TMEM216 | NM_001330285.2 | c.*21A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | NP_001317214.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00590 AC: 898AN: 152198Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
898
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00500 AC: 1229AN: 245600Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.00508 AC XY: 676AN XY: 133176
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1229
AN:
245600
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
676
AN XY:
133176
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00770 AC: 11226AN: 1458252Hom.: 61 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00742 AC XY: 5383AN XY: 725314
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11226
AN:
1458252
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5383
AN XY:
725314
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00590 AC: 898AN: 152316Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00513 AC XY: 382AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
898
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
382
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 03, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | TMEM216: BS2 - |
Meckel syndrome, type 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Joubert syndrome 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at