chr11-61796325-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2
The NM_004111.6(FEN1):c.964C>T(p.Arg322Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004111.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004111.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEN1 | NM_004111.6 | MANE Select | c.964C>T | p.Arg322Cys | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_004102.1 | P39748-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEN1 | ENST00000305885.3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.964C>T | p.Arg322Cys | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000305480.2 | P39748-1 | |
| FEN1 | ENST00000925117.1 | c.964C>T | p.Arg322Cys | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000595176.1 | |||
| FEN1 | ENST00000925118.1 | c.964C>T | p.Arg322Cys | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000595177.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000278 AC: 7AN: 251390 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000205 AC: 30AN: 1460982Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 726790 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74324 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at