chr11-64751590-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005609.4(PYGM):c.1827+7A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.106 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12,555 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005609.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYGM | ENST00000164139.4 | c.1827+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_005609.4 | ENSP00000164139.3 | ||||
PYGM | ENST00000377432.7 | c.1563+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000366650.3 | |||||
PYGM | ENST00000462303.1 | n.151+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.112 AC: 16966AN: 152098Hom.: 1322 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.144 AC: 36293AN: 251292Hom.: 3842 AF XY: 0.139 AC XY: 18873AN XY: 135802
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.105 AC: 154152AN: 1461720Hom.: 11231 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.106 AC XY: 77391AN XY: 727146
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.112 AC: 16993AN: 152216Hom.: 1324 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.118 AC XY: 8783AN XY: 74424
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease, type V Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jun 03, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:3Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28967462) - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 07, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at