chr11-64757779-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PP3_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2_Supporting

The NM_005609.4(PYGM):​c.660G>A​(p.Gln220Gln) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00252 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

PYGM
NM_005609.4 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.9997
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:3U:12B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.02

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PYGM (HGNC:9726): (glycogen phosphorylase, muscle associated) This gene encodes a muscle enzyme involved in glycogenolysis. Highly similar enzymes encoded by different genes are found in liver and brain. Mutations in this gene are associated with McArdle disease (myophosphorylase deficiency), a glycogen storage disease of muscle. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
PYGM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • glycogen storage disease V
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing predictors support a deleterious effect. Scorers claiming Pathogenic: dbscSNV1_ADA, dbscSNV1_RF, max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00185 (282/152340) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00891 (43/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0068. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 114 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR,AD geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PYGMNM_005609.4 linkc.660G>A p.Gln220Gln splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 20 ENST00000164139.4 NP_005600.1 P11217-1
PYGMNM_001164716.1 linkc.396G>A p.Gln132Gln splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 NP_001158188.1 P11217-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PYGMENST00000164139.4 linkc.660G>A p.Gln220Gln splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 20 1 NM_005609.4 ENSP00000164139.3 P11217-1
PYGMENST00000377432.7 linkc.396G>A p.Gln132Gln splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 2 ENSP00000366650.3 P11217-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00185
AC:
282
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000864
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00870
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00209
AC:
524
AN:
251172
AF XY:
0.00244
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000781
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000894
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00247
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00259
AC:
3784
AN:
1461830
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.00277
AC XY:
2018
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000358
AC:
12
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
53
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000650
AC:
17
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00655
AC:
565
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000562
AC:
3
AN:
53382
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00364
AC:
21
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00267
AC:
2970
AN:
1111992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
143
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
247
495
742
990
1237
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
112
224
336
448
560
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00185
AC:
282
AN:
152340
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00153
AC XY:
114
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000457
AC:
19
AN:
41584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
39
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000864
AC:
3
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00891
AC:
43
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00254
AC:
173
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
5
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
30
44
59
74
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00222
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00185
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00433
AC:
15
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00333
EpiControl
AF:
0.00290

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:12Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease, type V Pathogenic:2Uncertain:5Benign:1
Apr 14, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Kids Neuroscience Centre, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Detected two abnormal splicing events: (1) In-frame exon 5 skipping (r.529_660del). This event removes 44 amino acids from the glycogen phosphorylase domain of PYGM (p.(Met177_Gln220del)), of which 26 residues are conserved to Caenorhabditis elegans, (2) Exon 4 and exon 5 skipping (r.425_660del). This event induces a frameshift and encodes a premature termination codon (p.(Ala142Glyfs*32)). These transcripts are predicted to be targeted by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Any mis-spliced PYGM transcripts that escape NMD encode PYGM protein lacking 701 amino acids from the C-terminus, including 697 residues from the glycogen phosphorylase domain. -

May 14, 2018
CENTOGENE GmbH and LLC - Guiding Precision Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 05, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2023
Institute of Human Genetics, Clinical Exome/Genome Diagnostics Group, University Hospital Bonn
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jun 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:6
Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PYGM: PP3, PS3:Supporting -

Jan 06, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Published functional studies indicate this variant leads to aberrant splicing, demonstrating a damaging effect (PMID: 34906502); In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25914343, 28967462, 34426522, 25987006, 34906502, 35628876) -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Aug 15, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: PYGM c.660G>A (p.Gln220Gln) alters a conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. A recent publication reported experimental evidence that this variant affects mRNA splicing, demonstrating in-frame exon 5 skipping and out-of-frame exon 4-5 skipping, from whole blood derived RNA samples that were isolated from heterozygous carriers, however, the degree of mis-splicing (i.e. whether complete or partial) was not specified (Bournazos_2022). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0025 in 1614170 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0067 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.9 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PYGM causing Glycogen Storage Disease, Type V phenotype (0.0035). c.660G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Glycogen Storage Disease, Type V (McArdle disease) (Zoccolella_2015, Inal-Gultekin_2017); however, in two of these reported patients who were from the same family, two co-occurring pathogenic variants were also present (although the phase was not specified), thus potentially explaining the phenotype (Inal-Gultekin_2017). Additionally, the variant was reported in a case of Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy in the homozygous state (Barbosa-Gouveia_2022) and a case of metabolic disease in the heterozgous state (Abolhassani_2024). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 38374194, 35628876, 34906502, 28967462, 25987006). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 197777). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tip-toe gait Pathogenic:1
Dec 14, 2021
Practice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice Pomarino
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The Gln220= variant in PYGM does not lead to an amino acid exchange in the protein, but according to calculations by the prediction program varSEAK it could very likely lead to the generation of a new cryptic 5' donor splice site that would change the splice mechanism in intron 5. The variant was described in combination with another PYGM variant in a case report in a patient with symptoms of McArdle disease and multiple sclerosis [Zoccolella(2015) Neurol Sci 36(9):1721-3]. Toe Walking has various causes, ranging from idiopathic or habitual reasons to an underlying neuromuscular disease. The most observed form of toe walking is idiopathic toe walking (ITW) - a diagnosis of exclusion. ITW occurs in about 5% of children after their second birthday and is a common problem in pediatric orthopedics. In about 70% of these cases, there is spontaneous remission within six months of the onset of ITW. If the toe walk persists, one can assume the presence of a non-idiopathic form of toe walk (n-ITW). In n-ITW, the causes of the abnormal gait are neurological or myogenic. Differential diagnoses such as infantile cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, spinal amyotrophy and hereditary motor-sensory neuropathy as well as rare metabolic disorders of the musculature must be considered (Pomarino et al., 2018). In our clinical ITW consultation, we screen children with n-ITW for a genetic form of tiptoe gait using next generation sequencing for gene variants in 49 genes. These are genes in which gene variants can lead to neuromuscular diseases in which an association with toe-tapping gait has been reported or can be suspected due to patients’ clinical symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which several patients with toe walking displayed heterozygosity for pathogenic or likely pathogenic PYGM mutations and mild symptoms of the metabolic muscle disease McArdle. The findings of our research are in line with recently published observations in heterozygous family members patients with McArdle disease. We should mention that some of the patients in our cohort harbored heterozygous variants in other genes of our gene panel. However, the numbers in this study were too small to workout any resulting combined genetic effects. It is concluded that genetic conditions can contribute to the development of toe walking. Apparently, even a slight genetic weakening of the muscles can lead to changes to the gait pattern. Future studies must show how the pathomechanism can be explained for the PYGM variants and whether there are new therapeutic approaches to be developed based on this research. -

PYGM-related disorder Other:1
-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported on 08-23-2022 by GeneDx. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Benign
0.92
PhyloP100
5.0
Mutation Taster
=5/95
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Pathogenic
1.0
dbscSNV1_RF
Pathogenic
0.97
SpliceAI score (max)
0.65
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.65
Position offset: 16

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142234258; hg19: chr11-64525251; API