chr11-65872328-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):​c.27C>G​(p.Pro9Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000172 in 1,551,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000091 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.124

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
EFEMP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • lethal arteriopathy syndrome due to fibulin-4 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 11-65872328-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65872328-G-C is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 472818.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.124 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000919 (140/152336) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00322 (134/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00278. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 65 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016938.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
EFEMP2
NM_016938.5
MANE Select
c.27C>Gp.Pro9Pro
synonymous
Exon 2 of 11NP_058634.4
EFEMP2
NR_037718.2
n.152C>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 2 of 12

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
EFEMP2
ENST00000307998.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.27C>Gp.Pro9Pro
synonymous
Exon 2 of 11ENSP00000309953.6
EFEMP2
ENST00000531972.5
TSL:1
n.27C>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 2 of 12ENSP00000435295.1
EFEMP2
ENST00000528176.5
TSL:5
c.27C>Gp.Pro9Pro
synonymous
Exon 2 of 11ENSP00000434151.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000920
AC:
140
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00323
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000230
AC:
36
AN:
156246
AF XY:
0.000146
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000908
AC:
127
AN:
1399298
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000782
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
690168
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00329
AC:
104
AN:
31604
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000840
AC:
3
AN:
35706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25176
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35756
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
2
AN:
79234
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
49156
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5694
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000834
AC:
9
AN:
1078972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000155
AC:
9
AN:
58000
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
15
23
30
38
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000919
AC:
140
AN:
152336
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000873
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00322
AC:
134
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000327
AC:
5
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
13
19
26
32
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00101
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 29, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Benign:2
Jan 14, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 02, 2018
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 05, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
8.6
DANN
Benign
0.79
PhyloP100
0.12
PromoterAI
0.042
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144817331; hg19: chr11-65639799; API