chr11-6615001-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_000391.4(TPP1):c.1426-10A>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000391.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 2Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, Orphanet
- autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 7Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000391.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPP1 | NM_000391.4 | MANE Select | c.1426-10A>C | intron | N/A | NP_000382.3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPP1 | ENST00000299427.12 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1426-10A>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000299427.6 | |||
| TPP1 | ENST00000533371.6 | TSL:1 | c.697-10A>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000437066.1 | |||
| TPP1 | ENST00000682424.1 | c.1312-10A>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000507321.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at