chr11-6640068-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_003737.4(DCHS1):c.1546G>A(p.Ala516Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000765 in 1,613,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003737.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitral valve prolapse, myxomatous 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- van Maldergem syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- familial mitral valve prolapseInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- van Maldergem syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000775 AC: 118AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000849 AC: 213AN: 250742 AF XY: 0.000937 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000764 AC: 1116AN: 1461662Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000781 AC XY: 568AN XY: 727102 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000775 AC: 118AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000807 AC XY: 60AN XY: 74344 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
DCHS1: BP4 -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
BS2, BP4; This alteration was seen in a healthy adult where full penetrance of the disorder is expected at an early age, and is predicted to be tolerated by multiple functional prediction tools. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at