chr11-66523451-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_024649.5(BBS1):​c.831-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00047 in 1,614,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

BBS1
NM_024649.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.002442
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.20
Variant links:
Genes affected
BBS1 (HGNC:966): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1) Mutations in this gene have been observed in patients with the major form (type 1) of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. The encoded protein may play a role in eye, limb, cardiac and reproductive system development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ZDHHC24 (HGNC:27387): (zinc finger DHHC-type containing 24) Predicted to enable protein-cysteine S-palmitoyltransferase activity. Predicted to be involved in peptidyl-L-cysteine S-palmitoylation and protein targeting to membrane. Predicted to be integral component of membrane. Predicted to be active in Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.32).
BP6
Variant 11-66523451-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-66523451-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 96132.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3, Benign=3}. Variant chr11-66523451-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BBS1NM_024649.5 linkc.831-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000318312.12 NP_078925.3 Q8NFJ9-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BBS1ENST00000318312.12 linkc.831-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_024649.5 ENSP00000317469.7 Q8NFJ9-1
ENSG00000256349ENST00000419755.3 linkc.942-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 2 ENSP00000398526.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00261
AC:
397
AN:
152098
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00915
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000852
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000640
AC:
161
AN:
251486
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000456
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
135918
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00904
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000347
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000249
AC:
364
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000191
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00953
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000629
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000381
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00260
AC:
395
AN:
152216
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00245
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00913
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000785
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00112
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00289
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 14, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 27, 2016- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2024BBS1: BP4, BS2 -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 02, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 27, 2025- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0024
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.11
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56177555; hg19: chr11-66290922; API