chr11-7696766-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_198185.7(OVCH2):c.959G>A(p.Gly320Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000633 in 1,611,632 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G320V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198185.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_198185.7. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVCH2 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.959G>A | p.Gly320Glu | missense | Exon 9 of 16 | ENSP00000484497.2 | A0A087X1V8 | ||
| OVCH2 | TSL:5 | c.959G>A | p.Gly320Glu | missense | Exon 9 of 15 | ENSP00000484790.1 | A0A087X1V8 | ||
| OVCH2 | c.836-1578G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000501258.1 | A0A669KBI9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000452 AC: 11AN: 243554 AF XY: 0.0000379 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000617 AC: 90AN: 1459356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000648 AC XY: 47AN XY: 725664 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000671 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74470 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at