chr11-77211141-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.6052-11G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00353 in 1,561,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 170 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 92 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 78 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.006439
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.13

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO7A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
  • Usher syndrome type 1B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).
BP6
Variant 11-77211141-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77211141-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 43316.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0565 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.6052-11G>C intron_variant Intron 44 of 48 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.6052-11G>C intron_variant Intron 44 of 48 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.5938-11G>C intron_variant Intron 44 of 48 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.5905-11G>C intron_variant Intron 45 of 49 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkc.3478-11G>C intron_variant Intron 24 of 28 1 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkn.*624-11G>C intron_variant Intron 27 of 31 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0173
AC:
2636
AN:
152144
Hom.:
90
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0583
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0167
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00421
AC:
742
AN:
176362
AF XY:
0.00330
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0592
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000421
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00425
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00203
AC:
2865
AN:
1408758
Hom.:
78
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00182
AC XY:
1266
AN XY:
695126
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0632
AC:
2041
AN:
32294
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00421
AC:
160
AN:
37968
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
24932
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
36954
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000302
AC:
24
AN:
79562
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
50006
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00811
AC:
46
AN:
5672
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000259
AC:
281
AN:
1082964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00536
AC:
313
AN:
58406
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
131
263
394
526
657
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
72
144
216
288
360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0174
AC:
2650
AN:
152262
Hom.:
92
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0169
AC XY:
1261
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0585
AC:
2429
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0100
AC:
153
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000426
AC:
29
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0166
AC:
35
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
121
241
362
482
603
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00893
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.0196

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jan 09, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

6052-11G>C in Intron 44 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 4.4% (150/3442) of African Americ an chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ht tp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs112564978). -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0064
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.062
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112564978; hg19: chr11-76922186; API