chr12-112453279-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PP2PP3PS2PM2PS4PS3
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.417G>C (p.Glu139Asp) variant in PTPN11 has been reported as a confirmed de novo occurrence in at least 2 patients and at least 5 other independent occurrences in patients with clinical features of a RASopathy (PS2_VeryStrong; PS4; GeneDx, Baylor, BC Children's internal data; SCV000057396.11, SCV000196664.1, SCV000803709.1; GTR Lab ID: 26957, 1006, 249401 PMID:22315187, 17020470, 11992261). This variant was absent from large population studies (PM2; ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org). In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that the p.Glu139Asp variant may impact protein function (PS3; PMID:23584145, 15987685, 18372317). The variant is located in the PTPN11 gene, which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel as a gene with a low rate of benign missense variants and pathogenic missense variants are common (PP2; PMID:29493581). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the c.417G>C (p.Glu139Asp) variant may impact the protein (PP3). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for RASopathies in an autosomal dominant manner. Rasopathy-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied (PMID:29493581): PS2_VeryStrong, PS3, PS4, PM2, PP2, PP3. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA177671/MONDO:0018997/004
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001330437.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- LEOPARD syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Noonan syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Noonan syndrome with multiple lentiginesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- metachondromatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Costello syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001330437.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTPN11 | NM_002834.5 | MANE Select | c.417G>C | p.Glu139Asp | missense | Exon 4 of 16 | NP_002825.3 | ||
| PTPN11 | NM_001330437.2 | c.417G>C | p.Glu139Asp | missense | Exon 4 of 16 | NP_001317366.1 | |||
| PTPN11 | NM_001374625.1 | c.414G>C | p.Glu138Asp | missense | Exon 4 of 16 | NP_001361554.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTPN11 | ENST00000351677.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.417G>C | p.Glu139Asp | missense | Exon 4 of 16 | ENSP00000340944.3 | ||
| PTPN11 | ENST00000635625.1 | TSL:5 | c.417G>C | p.Glu139Asp | missense | Exon 4 of 15 | ENSP00000489597.1 | ||
| PTPN11 | ENST00000392597.5 | TSL:1 | c.417G>C | p.Glu139Asp | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | ENSP00000376376.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461586Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727090 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74364
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at