chr12-112454556-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.526-8C>A variant in the PTPN11 gene is 0.079% (65/66646) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA134672/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

PTPN11
NM_002834.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0008700
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.234
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTPN11 (HGNC:9644): (protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. PTPs are known to be signaling molecules that regulate a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation. This PTP contains two tandem Src homology-2 domains, which function as phospho-tyrosine binding domains and mediate the interaction of this PTP with its substrates. This PTP is widely expressed in most tissues and plays a regulatory role in various cell signaling events that are important for a diversity of cell functions, such as mitogenic activation, metabolic control, transcription regulation, and cell migration. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Noonan syndrome as well as acute myeloid leukemia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PTPN11NM_002834.5 linkc.526-8C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 15 ENST00000351677.7 NP_002825.3 Q06124-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PTPN11ENST00000351677.7 linkc.526-8C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 15 1 NM_002834.5 ENSP00000340944.3 Q06124-2
PTPN11ENST00000635625.1 linkc.526-8C>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 14 5 ENSP00000489597.1 Q06124-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000605
AC:
92
AN:
152148
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000670
AC:
168
AN:
250918
AF XY:
0.000568
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000817
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00138
AC:
1986
AN:
1443530
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00135
AC XY:
973
AN XY:
719330
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000272
AC:
9
AN:
33104
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
AC:
9
AN:
44682
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26040
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39590
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
85798
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000131
AC:
7
AN:
53406
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00174
AC:
1904
AN:
1096000
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.000954
AC:
57
AN:
59722
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
99
198
296
395
494
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
80
160
240
320
400
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000604
AC:
92
AN:
152266
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000510
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
AC:
0.000384986
AN:
0.000384986
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00112
AC:
0.00111735
AN:
0.00111735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00129
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000620
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000872
EpiControl
AF:
0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PTPN11: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 17, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 19, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:6
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.526-8C>A in intron 4 of PTPN11: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because a change at this position does not diverge from the splice consensus sequence and is therefore unlikely to impact splicing. Furthermore, sp lice variants are not a known mechanism of disease for Noonan syndrome. It has a lso been identified in 0.1% (65/66646) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggr egation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs184804143). -

May 31, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 17, 2020
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

RASopathy Benign:3
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017
ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.526-8C>A variant in the PTPN11 gene is 0.079% (65/66646) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

-
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

LEOPARD syndrome 1 Benign:2
Mar 08, 2019
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BS1,BS2. -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Noonan syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Metachondromatosis Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Oct 11, 2013
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Apr 01, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.63
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00087
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.080
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs184804143; hg19: chr12-112892360; API