chr12-132632393-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.6252A>G​(p.Ser2084Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.608 in 1,613,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 301,912 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 33668 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.60 ( 268244 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.33
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 12-132632393-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132632393-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380217.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-132632393-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.33 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.783 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkc.6252A>G p.Ser2084Ser synonymous_variant Exon 45 of 49 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2 Q07864
POLEXM_011534795.4 linkc.6252A>G p.Ser2084Ser synonymous_variant Exon 45 of 48 XP_011533097.1
POLEXM_011534797.4 linkc.5331A>G p.Ser1777Ser synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 40 XP_011533099.1
POLEXM_011534802.4 linkc.3240A>G p.Ser1080Ser synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 24 XP_011533104.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkc.6252A>G p.Ser2084Ser synonymous_variant Exon 45 of 49 1 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570.5 Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.659
AC:
100172
AN:
151994
Hom.:
33636
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.767
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.591
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.736
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.526
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.803
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.626
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.579
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.630
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.639
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.644
AC:
161809
AN:
251400
Hom.:
53311
AF XY:
0.632
AC XY:
85904
AN XY:
135884
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.767
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.794
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.531
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.813
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.613
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.577
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.585
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.627
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.603
AC:
881194
AN:
1461068
Hom.:
268244
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
0.602
AC XY:
437719
AN XY:
726904
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.766
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.532
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.806
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.610
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.574
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.586
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.612
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.659
AC:
100256
AN:
152112
Hom.:
33668
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.660
AC XY:
49103
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.767
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.737
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.526
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.803
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.626
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.579
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.641
Alfa
AF:
0.603
Hom.:
48177
Bravo
AF:
0.675
Asia WGS
AF:
0.698
AC:
2425
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.575
EpiControl
AF:
0.575

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Oct 17, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are pr eliminary notes: Frequency -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:4
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 17, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.6252G>A (p.Ser2084=) in POLE gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.638 (77431/1211338 chrs tested) including numerous homozygous occurrences. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals or cited by reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Oct 25, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 20, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome Benign:1
Oct 25, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.41
DANN
Benign
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5745022; hg19: chr12-133208979; COSMIC: COSV105207645; COSMIC: COSV105207645; API