chr12-132635909-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.5794C>T(p.Arg1932Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000109 in 1,461,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.5794C>T | p.Arg1932Cys | missense_variant | 42/49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 | |
POLE | XM_011534795.4 | c.5794C>T | p.Arg1932Cys | missense_variant | 42/48 | XP_011533097.1 | ||
POLE | XM_011534797.4 | c.4873C>T | p.Arg1625Cys | missense_variant | 34/40 | XP_011533099.1 | ||
POLE | XM_011534802.4 | c.2782C>T | p.Arg928Cys | missense_variant | 18/24 | XP_011533104.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.5794C>T | p.Arg1932Cys | missense_variant | 42/49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000110 AC: 16AN: 1461192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 726884
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 29, 2023 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 1932 of the POLE protein (p.Arg1932Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with POLE-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 246233). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt POLE protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 08, 2024 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as germline pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25759019, 31829442) - |
POLE-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 21, 2023 | The POLE c.5794C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg1932Cys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature or in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. In ClinVar, this variant is interpreted as uncertain (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/246233/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at