chr12-132681219-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.123G>A(p.Thr41Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000943 in 1,614,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00073 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.60

Variant links:

Genes affected

POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

POLE links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).

BP6

Variant 12-132681219-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132681219-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 240383.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.6 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.003 (457/152324) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00962 (400/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00884. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 226 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
POLE	NM_006231.4 link	c.123G>A	p.Thr41Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 49	ENST00000320574.10	NP_006222.2	Q07864

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
POLE	ENST00000320574.10 link	c.123G>A	p.Thr41Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 49	1	NM_006231.4	ENSP00000322570.5		Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00298

AC:

454

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00957

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00770

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00117

AC:

294

AN:

251472

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000912

AC XY:

124

AN XY:

135910

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0107

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000520

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00533

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000729

AC:

1065

AN:

1461876

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000685

AC XY:

498

AN XY:

727232

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0108

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000693

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0153

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000719

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000911

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00300

AC:

457

AN:

152324

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00303

AC XY:

226

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00771

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00236

Alfa

AF:

0.00107

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00364

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00346

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Aug 11, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: POLE c.123G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 277224 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.01 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 704 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.123G>A in individuals affected with Colorectal Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jun 07, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Feb 15, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 20, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jun 27, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 25, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.67

CADD

Benign

1.6

DANN

Benign

0.79

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over