chr12-21848190-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_020297.4(ABCC9):c.2826T>C(p.Tyr942Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000144 in 1,613,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000077 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ABCC9
NM_020297.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.633

Variant links:

Genes affected

ABCC9 (HGNC:60): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein is thought to form ATP-sensitive potassium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle. Protein structure suggests a role as the drug-binding channel-modulating subunit of the extra-pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Mutations in this gene are associated with cardiomyopathy dilated type 1O. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]

ABCC9 links:

ENSG00000257022 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000257022 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).

BP6

Variant 12-21848190-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-21848190-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 201611.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=4, Likely_benign=1}. Variant chr12-21848190-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.633 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000794 (121/152332) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00267 (111/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00227. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 53 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ABCC9	NM_020297.4 link	c.2826T>C	p.Tyr942Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 25 of 40	ENST00000261200.9	NP_064693.2	O60706-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ABCC9	ENST00000261200.9 link	c.2826T>C	p.Tyr942Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 25 of 40	5	NM_020297.4	ENSP00000261200.4		O60706-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000795

AC:

121

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000183

AC:

AN:

251386

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000155

AC XY:

AN XY:

135862

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00240

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000766

AC:

112

AN:

1461366

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000702

AC XY:

AN XY:

726988

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00287

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

9.00e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000133

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000794

AC:

121

AN:

152332

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000711

AC XY:

AN XY:

74496

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00267

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.0000282

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000858

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1O

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Sep 23, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 09, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: ABCC9 c.2826T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00026 in 277136 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 11-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ABCC9 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2826T>C in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (2 x likely benign/benign, 1 x VUS). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Hypertrichotic osteochondrodysplasia Cantu type

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Dec 18, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 17, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

2.9

DANN

Benign

0.77

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over