chr12-21882785-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_020297.4(ABCC9):c.2000C>A(p.Thr667Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,460,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T667I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020297.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hypertrichotic osteochondrodysplasia Cantu typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1OInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Illumina, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- intellectual disability and myopathy syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- acromegaloid facial appearance syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hypertrichosis-acromegaloid facial appearance syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- atrial fibrillation, familial, 12Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020297.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCC9 | NM_020297.4 | MANE Select | c.2000C>A | p.Thr667Lys | missense | Exon 16 of 40 | NP_064693.2 | ||
| ABCC9 | NM_001377273.1 | c.2000C>A | p.Thr667Lys | missense | Exon 17 of 41 | NP_001364202.1 | |||
| ABCC9 | NM_005691.4 | c.2000C>A | p.Thr667Lys | missense | Exon 16 of 41 | NP_005682.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCC9 | ENST00000261200.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.2000C>A | p.Thr667Lys | missense | Exon 16 of 40 | ENSP00000261200.4 | ||
| ABCC9 | ENST00000261201.10 | TSL:5 | c.2000C>A | p.Thr667Lys | missense | Exon 16 of 41 | ENSP00000261201.4 | ||
| ABCC9 | ENST00000684084.1 | c.2000C>A | p.Thr667Lys | missense | Exon 16 of 40 | ENSP00000507859.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1460548Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726674 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1O Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt ABCC9 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 45396). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with dilated cardiomyopathy (PMID: 27532257). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 667 of the ABCC9 protein (p.Thr667Lys).
not specified Uncertain:1
The Thr667Lys variant (ABCC9) has not been reported in the literature but has be en detected by our laboratory in 1 individual with LV dilation and ventricular t achycardia. This individual carried 3 additional variants of unknown significan ce in the TTN gene. Threonine at position 667 is highly conserved in evolution, suggesting that a change may not be tolerated. Two out of 3 computational tools (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) predict an impact the protein although their accur acy is unknown. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time.
not provided Uncertain:1
A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the ABCC9 gene. Although this variant has not been seen previously at GeneDx, it is reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine (Landrum et al., 2014). Furthermore, Pugh et al. (2014) report the T667K variant in an adult patient with left ventricular enlargement/dilation and ventricular tachycardia, and the authors classified T667K as a variant of uncertain significance. This patient harbored an additional two variants of uncertain significance in the TTN gene. The T667K variant was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The T667K variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved across species, and in silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at