chr12-2486257-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):āc.911T>Cā(p.Ile304Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000954 in 1,612,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000719.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | NM_000719.7 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENST00000399655.6 | NP_000710.5 | |
CACNA1C | NM_001167623.2 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENST00000399603.6 | NP_001161095.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | ENST00000399603.6 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 5 | NM_001167623.2 | ENSP00000382512.1 | ||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399655.6 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | NM_000719.7 | ENSP00000382563.1 | ||
CACNA1C | ENST00000682544.1 | c.1001T>C | p.Ile334Thr | missense_variant | 6/50 | ENSP00000507184.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000406454.8 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | 5 | ENSP00000385896.3 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399634.6 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 5 | ENSP00000382542.2 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000683824.1 | c.1001T>C | p.Ile334Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | ENSP00000507867.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000347598.9 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/49 | 1 | ENSP00000266376.6 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000344100.7 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000341092.3 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000327702.12 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | 1 | ENSP00000329877.7 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399617.6 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | 5 | ENSP00000382526.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000682462.1 | c.1001T>C | p.Ile334Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000507105.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000683781.1 | c.1001T>C | p.Ile334Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000507434.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000683840.1 | c.1001T>C | p.Ile334Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000507612.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000683956.1 | c.1001T>C | p.Ile334Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000506882.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399638.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | 1 | ENSP00000382547.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000335762.10 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | 5 | ENSP00000336982.5 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399606.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/48 | 1 | ENSP00000382515.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399621.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382530.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399637.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382546.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000402845.7 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000385724.3 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399629.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382537.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000682336.1 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000507898.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399591.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/46 | 1 | ENSP00000382500.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399595.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/46 | 1 | ENSP00000382504.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399649.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/46 | 1 | ENSP00000382557.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399597.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382506.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399601.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382510.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399641.6 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382549.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399644.5 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | 1 | ENSP00000382552.1 | |||
CACNA1C | ENST00000682835.1 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000507282.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000683482.1 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/47 | ENSP00000507169.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000682686.1 | c.911T>C | p.Ile304Thr | missense_variant | 6/46 | ENSP00000507309.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000682152.1 | c.860T>C | p.Ile287Thr | missense_variant | 5/6 | ENSP00000506759.1 | ||||
CACNA1C | ENST00000480911.6 | n.911T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/27 | 5 | ENSP00000437936.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000625 AC: 95AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000500 AC: 124AN: 248032Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000558 AC XY: 75AN XY: 134508
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000988 AC: 1443AN: 1460794Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000943 AC XY: 685AN XY: 726604
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000624 AC: 95AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000538 AC XY: 40AN XY: 74418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 07, 2017 | A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the CACNA1C gene. The I304T variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. This variant has previously been observed independently or in conjunction with additional cardiogenetic variants in multiple other unrelated individuals referred for arrhythmia genetic testing at GeneDx. However, segregation data is uninformative. In addition, this variant has been classified in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by other clinical laboratories (ClinVar SCV000231571.1, SCV000259358.1, SCV000318927.1, SCV000280059.1; Landrum et al., 2016). The NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project and the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) report the I304T variant was observed in 10/8,588 alleles from individuals of European background and 58/66,110 alleles from individual of Non-Finnish European background, respectively. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved across species, and Threonine is the wild-type amino acid at this position in at least one species. Furthermore, in silico analysis predicts this variant likely does not alter the protein structure/function. Nevertheless, the I304T variant results in a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties.Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is pathogenic or benign. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | - | Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. Given the lack of case data and the rare occurrence in individuals not selected for Mendelian phenotypes, we consider this a variant of uncertain significance. The variant is novel. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be benign and SIFT predicts it to be tolerated. The isoleucine at codon 304 is not conserved across species. The variant was reported online in 30 of 60,304 individuals (including 29 of 36,923 European individuals, 1 of 4949 African-American individuals, and 1 of 5780 Latino Individuals) in the Exome Aggregation Consortium dataset (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/) (as of December 1st, 2014). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. Note that other variants with strong evidence for pathogenicity have been seen at similar frequencies in this dataset so this does not necessarily rule out pathogenicity (Pan et al 2012). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 16, 2024 | Variant summary: CACNA1C c.911T>C (p.Ile304Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Ion transport domain (IPR005821) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0005 in 248032 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 49.99 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CACNA1C causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05). c.911T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Long QT syndrome, arrythmia, and Brugada syndrome (Wemhoner_2015, VanLint_2019, Bora_2023, Novelli_2022). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 37901857, 34999275, 30847666, 25633834). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 190631). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | CACNA1C: PP2, BS1, BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 11, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Timothy syndrome;C2678478:Brugada syndrome 3;C5774213:Neurodevelopmental disorder with hypotonia, language delay, and skeletal defects with or without seizures;CN260585:Long qt syndrome 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | CACNA1C NM_000719.6 exon 6 p.Ile304Thr (c.911T>C): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.1% (11/10290) of Ashkenazi Jewish alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-2595423-T-C). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:190631). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Timothy syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center | Dec 18, 2024 | - - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 28, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at