chr12-25245361-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.24A>G (p.Val8=) variant in the KRAS gene is 0.0499% (35/51828) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as likely benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BS1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA135558/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KRAS
NM_033360.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.144

Publications

13 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

KRAS (HGNC:6407): (KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase) This gene, a Kirsten ras oncogene homolog from the mammalian ras gene family, encodes a protein that is a member of the small GTPase superfamily. A single amino acid substitution is responsible for an activating mutation. The transforming protein that results is implicated in various malignancies, including lung adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenoma, ductal carcinoma of the pancreas and colorectal carcinoma. Alternative splicing leads to variants encoding two isoforms that differ in the C-terminal region. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

KRAS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
Noonan syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Noonan syndrome 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
linear nevus sebaceous syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Costello syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

KRAS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BS1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KRAS	NM_033360.4 link	c.24A>G	p.Val8Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 6	ENST00000256078.10	NP_203524.1
KRAS	NM_004985.5 link	c.24A>G	p.Val8Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 5	ENST00000311936.8	NP_004976.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KRAS	ENST00000256078.10 link	c.24A>G	p.Val8Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 6	1	NM_033360.4	ENSP00000256078.5
KRAS	ENST00000311936.8 link	c.24A>G	p.Val8Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 5	1	NM_004985.5	ENSP00000308495.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000470

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000245

AC:

AN:

248556

AF XY:

0.000238

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000125

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000508

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000329

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000484

AC:

707

AN:

1460222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000435

AC XY:

316

AN XY:

726306

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

AN:

33464

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44612

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26050

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39664

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85898

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53366

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000612

AC:

680

AN:

1111088

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000365

AC:

AN:

60312

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

137

171

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

102

136

170

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000202

AC XY:

AN XY:

74380

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000482

AC:

AN:

41466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000470

AC:

AN:

68044

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.515

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000507

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000230

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 19, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

KRAS: BP4, BP7

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:4

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 23, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Feb 24, 2010

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 23, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RASopathy

Benign:2

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 18, 2017

ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.24A>G (p.Val8=) variant in the KRAS gene is 0.0499% (35/51828) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as likely benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BS1; PMID:29493581)

Malignant tumor of urinary bladder;C0023467:Acute myeloid leukemia;C0024623:Gastric cancer;C0235974:Carcinoma of pancreas;C0242379:Lung cancer;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0917804:Cerebral arteriovenous malformation;C1838329:Toriello-Lacassie-Droste syndrome;C1860991:Noonan syndrome 3;C2674723:Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type 4;C3809005:Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 2;C4552097:Linear nevus sebaceous syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 26, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Dec 30, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

9.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.75

PhyloP100

0.14

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Mutation Taster

=81/19

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over