chr12-318409-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001042603.3(KDM5A):c.2594T>G(p.Met865Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,613,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M865T) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042603.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital heart diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD, AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
- El Hayek-Chahrour neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDM5A | NM_001042603.3 | c.2594T>G | p.Met865Arg | missense_variant | Exon 19 of 28 | ENST00000399788.7 | NP_001036068.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000121 AC: 3AN: 247256 AF XY: 0.00000744 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461804Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727212 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74266 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at