chr12-5045296-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002234.4(KCNA5):c.1149T>C(p.Gly383Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.985 in 152,302 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73,946 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.99 ( 73946 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 ( 728612 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

KCNA5
NM_002234.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.24

Variant links:

Genes affected

KCNA5 (HGNC:6224): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5) Potassium channels represent the most complex class of voltage-gated ino channels from both functional and structural standpoints. Their diverse functions include regulating neurotransmitter release, heart rate, insulin secretion, neuronal excitability, epithelial electrolyte transport, smooth muscle contraction, and cell volume. Four sequence-related potassium channel genes - shaker, shaw, shab, and shal - have been identified in Drosophila, and each has been shown to have human homolog(s). This gene encodes a member of the potassium channel, voltage-gated, shaker-related subfamily. This member contains six membrane-spanning domains with a shaker-type repeat in the fourth segment. It belongs to the delayed rectifier class, the function of which could restore the resting membrane potential of beta cells after depolarization and thereby contribute to the regulation of insulin secretion. This gene is intronless, and the gene is clustered with genes KCNA1 and KCNA6 on chromosome 12. Defects in this gene are a cause of familial atrial fibrillation type 7 (ATFB7). [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

KCNA5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.02).

BP6

Variant 12-5045296-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-5045296-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 258594.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-5045296-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.24 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KCNA5	NM_002234.4 link	c.1149T>C	p.Gly383Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 1	ENST00000252321.5	NP_002225.2	P22460-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KCNA5	ENST00000252321.5 link	c.1149T>C	p.Gly383Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 1	6	NM_002234.4	ENSP00000252321.3		P22460-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.985

AC:

149929

AN:

152184

Hom.:

73890

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.950

Gnomad AMI

AF:

1.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.993

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

1.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.996

Gnomad SAS

AF:

1.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

1.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.997

Gnomad NFE

AF:

1.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.990

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.996

AC:

250415

AN:

251388

Hom.:

124739

AF XY:

0.997

AC XY:

135486

AN XY:

135872

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.952

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.998

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.995

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.998

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR

AF:

0.998

AC:

1459505

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

728612

Cov.:

100

AF XY:

0.999

AC XY:

726203

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.950

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.997

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.994

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.996

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.985

AC:

150044

AN:

152302

Hom.:

73946

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.986

AC XY:

73442

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.950

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.993

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.996

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

1.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.990

Alfa

AF:

0.998

Hom.:

8018

Bravo

AF:

0.983

Asia WGS

AF:

0.995

AC:

3462

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Apr 04, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2024

Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 100% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 95. Only high quality variants are reported. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Atrial fibrillation, familial, 7

Benign:4

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 19, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-1.0

CADD

Benign

0.22

DANN

Benign

0.42

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over